| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5671105.lOV4Wx5bFT@diego>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:49:54 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] media: hantro: Add support for the Rockchip PX30
Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2021, 11:48:26 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2021, 10:05:16 CET schrieb Paul Kocialkowski:
> > Hi Ezequiel,
> >
> > On Thu 07 Jan 21, 16:08, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Happy to see this patch. It was on my TODO list,
> > > but I hadn't had time to bringup my rk3326 device.
> >
> > Same here, I just had an occasion to use it again these days so I jumped
> > on it!
> >
> > > A few comments.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 14:41 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > > The PX30 SoC includes both the VDPU2 and VEPU2 blocks which are similar
> > > > to the RK3399 (Hantro G1/H1 with shuffled registers).
> > > >
> > > > Besides taking an extra clock, it also shares an interrupt with the IOMMU
> > > > so it's necessary to request the interrupt shared.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you clarify on the commit description which iommu device interrupt
> > > line is being shared?
> >
> > Sure! It's IRQ 79 of the GIC that's shared with vopl_mmu.
> > It's not very obvious in the dt commit.
>
> Having looked through the docs again, I think that the vopl_mmu using
> irq 79 is just a mistake:
>
> (1) in general vop and vop-mmu use the same irq (78 in that case)
> (2) Rockchip does seem to have fixed that in their 4.19 tree as well:
> https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-4.19/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi#L1598
(3) https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/commit/391a5c5f96d177896f9fe92ca1c83e00f4352191 ;-)
>
> So to me it looks like this doesn't need to be shared and instead
> "simply" the px30 dtsi fixed ;-)
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 5 +++--
> > > > drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h | 1 +
> > > > drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> > > > index e5f200e64993..076a7782b476 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> > > > @@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_file_operations hantro_fops = {
> > > >
> > > > static const struct of_device_id of_hantro_match[] = {
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_HANTRO_ROCKCHIP
> > > > + { .compatible = "rockchip,px30-vpu", .data = &px30_vpu_variant, },
> > > > { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-vpu", .data = &rk3399_vpu_variant, },
> > > > { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-vpu", .data = &rk3328_vpu_variant, },
> > > > { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-vpu", .data = &rk3288_vpu_variant, },
> > > > @@ -796,8 +797,8 @@ static int hantro_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > return -ENXIO;
> > > >
> > > > ret = devm_request_irq(vpu->dev, irq,
> > > > - vpu->variant->irqs[i].handler, 0,
> > > > - dev_name(vpu->dev), vpu);
> > > > + vpu->variant->irqs[i].handler,
> > > > + IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(vpu->dev), vpu);
> > >
> > > Maybe this irq flag should be part of vpu->variant? It sounds like an IP block
> > > integration specific thing.
> >
> > Ah right, I agree that it would be justified. But it would also be simple to
> > just fix the irq handlers and assume this can generally be the case, because it
> > feels like a bit of a detail to justify a flag.
> >
> > Do you think this could be a safe/workable assumption?
> >
> > > Also, you will need a px30-specific interrupt handler now,
> > > since the rk3399 one is not shared-friendly.
> >
> > Yeah I realize I haven't been very careful there and didn't really check that
> > the IOMMU driver is really safe to handle shared interrupts either. I'll take
> > a look a that when crafting v2.
> >
> > > > if (ret) {
> > > > dev_err(vpu->dev, "Could not request %s IRQ.\n",
> > > > irq_name);
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h
> > > > index 34c9e4649a25..07f516fd7a2e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h
> > > > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum hantro_enc_fmt {
> > > > RK3288_VPU_ENC_FMT_UYVY422 = 3,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +extern const struct hantro_variant px30_vpu_variant;
> > > > extern const struct hantro_variant rk3399_vpu_variant;
> > > > extern const struct hantro_variant rk3328_vpu_variant;
> > > > extern const struct hantro_variant rk3288_vpu_variant;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c
> > > > index 7a7962cf771e..4112f98baa60 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c
> > >
> > > Perhaps it's time to rename this to rockchip_vpu_hw.c,
> > > and merge rk3288 and rk3399? It's a nitpick, though.
> >
> > Haha, I was thinking the exact same thing but wasn't sure it would be welcome!
> >
> > I was thinking of rockchip_vpu2_hw.c or rockchip_vdpu2_hw.c since that's
> > apparently how it's called in Rockchip terminology: VDPU2 and VEPU2 for the
> > Hantro G1 and H1 with the shuffled register layout. The rk3288 stuff is
> > probably VDPU1/VEPU1 and we might want to rename it accordingly as well.
> >
> > Cheers and thanks for the review!
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > > > @@ -220,3 +220,24 @@ const struct hantro_variant rk3328_vpu_variant = {
> > > > .clk_names = rk3399_clk_names,
> > > > .num_clocks = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_clk_names),
> > > > };
> > > > +
> > > > +static const char * const px30_clk_names[] = {
> > > > + "aclk", "hclk", "sclk"
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +const struct hantro_variant px30_vpu_variant = {
> > > > + .enc_offset = 0x0,
> > > > + .enc_fmts = rk3399_vpu_enc_fmts,
> > > > + .num_enc_fmts = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_vpu_enc_fmts),
> > > > + .dec_offset = 0x400,
> > > > + .dec_fmts = rk3399_vpu_dec_fmts,
> > > > + .num_dec_fmts = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_vpu_dec_fmts),
> > > > + .codec = HANTRO_JPEG_ENCODER | HANTRO_MPEG2_DECODER |
> > > > + HANTRO_VP8_DECODER,
> > > > + .codec_ops = rk3399_vpu_codec_ops,
> > > > + .irqs = rk3399_irqs,
> > > > + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3399_irqs),
> > > > + .init = rk3399_vpu_hw_init,
> > > > + .clk_names = px30_clk_names,
> > > > + .num_clocks = ARRAY_SIZE(px30_clk_names)
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ezequiel
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists