linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] media: hantro: Add support for the Rockchip PX30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9a163675ae05cc77b2d527ea5d68064fbbeead9.camel@collabora.com>
Date:   Fri, 08 Jan 2021 10:13:36 -0300
From:   Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
To:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] media: hantro: Add support for the Rockchip PX30

On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 10:05 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
> 
> On Thu 07 Jan 21, 16:08, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Happy to see this patch. It was on my TODO list,
> > but I hadn't had time to bringup my rk3326 device.
> 
> Same here, I just had an occasion to use it again these days so I jumped
> on it!
> 
> > A few comments.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2021-01-07 at 14:41 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > The PX30 SoC includes both the VDPU2 and VEPU2 blocks which are similar
> > > to the RK3399 (Hantro G1/H1 with shuffled registers).
> > > 
> > > Besides taking an extra clock, it also shares an interrupt with the IOMMU
> > > so it's necessary to request the interrupt shared.
> > > 
> > 
[..]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h
> > > index 34c9e4649a25..07f516fd7a2e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_hw.h
> > > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum hantro_enc_fmt {
> > >         RK3288_VPU_ENC_FMT_UYVY422 = 3,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > +extern const struct hantro_variant px30_vpu_variant;
> > >  extern const struct hantro_variant rk3399_vpu_variant;
> > >  extern const struct hantro_variant rk3328_vpu_variant;
> > >  extern const struct hantro_variant rk3288_vpu_variant;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c
> > > index 7a7962cf771e..4112f98baa60 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3399_vpu_hw.c
> > 
> > Perhaps it's time to rename this to rockchip_vpu_hw.c,
> > and merge rk3288 and rk3399? It's a nitpick, though.
> 
> Haha, I was thinking the exact same thing but wasn't sure it would be welcome!
> 
> I was thinking of rockchip_vpu2_hw.c or rockchip_vdpu2_hw.c since that's
> apparently how it's called in Rockchip terminology: VDPU2 and VEPU2 for the
> Hantro G1 and H1 with the shuffled register layout. The rk3288 stuff is
> probably VDPU1/VEPU1 and we might want to rename it accordingly as well.
> 

I'd rather keep it simple as rockchip_vpu_hw.c and just throw in there
all the rockchip stuff.

Thanks,
Ezequiel