linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e1d30642-ce85-b9b7-e8b2-5ad4fe6338e5@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:46:29 -0800
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        "linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, moritzf@...gle.com,
        Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
        Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>,
        Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
        "Gerlach, Matthew" <matthew.gerlach@...el.com>,
        Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@...inx.com>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        Richard Gong <richard.gong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] FPGA DFL Changes for 5.12


On 1/7/21 8:09 AM, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 1/6/21 8:37 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> This is a resend of the previous (unfortunately late) patchset of
>> changes for FPGA DFL.
> Is there something I can do to help ?
>
> I am paid to look after linux-fpga, so i have plenty of time.
>
> Some ideas of what i am doing now privately i can do publicly.
>
> 1. keep linux-fpga sync-ed to greg's branch so linux-fpga is normally in a pullable state.
>
> 2. an in-flight dev branch for the outstanding patches 

I have setup these branches based on Greg's char-misc-next

fpga-next, which is char-misc-next base for fpga-testing

fpga-testing, all the in-flight patches that would apply with automatic merge conflict resolution

These are respectively

https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-next

https://github.com/trixirt/linux-fpga/tree/fpga-testing


There are two trivial changes, that could go to 5.12 now.

fpga: dfl: fme: Constify static attribute_group structs

fpga: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

respectively

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210108235414.48017-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201228135135.28788-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com/


There are a couple of patchsets that conflict

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20210105230855.15019-7-russell.h.weight@intel.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201203171548.1538178-3-matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com/

Which I will follow up on.


And the xilinx patchset

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/20201217075046.28553-1-sonals@xilinx.com/

Which is being split/worked on offline.


If I have missed any patchset, poke me.

Tom


>
> Tom
>
>