linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/26] of/fdt: Introduce early_init_dt_add_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLmzFWmTc=6JSRMofSEVRx9GCrwGxEsYog9dC16EMGdvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:45:10 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, android-kvm@...gle.com,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)" 
        <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/26] of/fdt: Introduce early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp()

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:16 AM Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp() to allow KVM to conserve a copy
> of the memory regions parsed from DT. This will be needed in the context
> of the protected nVHE feature of KVM/arm64 where the code running at EL2
> will be cleanly separated from the host kernel during boot, and will
> need its own representation of memory.

What happened to doing this with memblock?

> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index 4602e467ca8b..af2b5a09c5b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -1099,6 +1099,10 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
>  #define MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR      ((phys_addr_t)~0)
>  #endif
>
> +void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp(u64 base, u64 size)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
>  {
>         const u64 phys_offset = MIN_MEMBLOCK_ADDR;
> @@ -1139,6 +1143,7 @@ void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
>                 base = phys_offset;
>         }
>         memblock_add(base, size);
> +       early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp(base, size);
>  }
>
>  int __init __weak early_init_dt_mark_hotplug_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> --
> 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
>