lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:06:43 -0500
From:   Qian Cai <qcai@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes
 in memory layout

On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 17:39 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:04:21PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 10:05 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > I think we trigger PF_POISONED_CHECK() in PageSlab(), then
> > > fffffffffffffffe
> > > is "accessed" from VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> > > 
> > > It seems to me that we are not initializing struct pages for holes at the
> > > node
> > > boundaries because zones are already clamped to exclude those holes.
> > > 
> > > Can you please try to see if the patch below will produce any useful info:
> > 
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 8c, epfn: 9b, zone: DMA, node:
> > 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 1f7be, epfn: 1f9fe, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 28784, epfn: 288e4, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 298b9, epfn: 298bd, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29923, epfn: 29931, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29933, epfn: 29941, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29945, epfn: 29946, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 29ff9, epfn: 2a823, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 33a23, epfn: 33a53, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > [    0.000000] init_unavailable_range: spfn: 78000, epfn: 100000, zone:
> > DMA32, node: 0
> > ...
> > [  572.222563][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 47f380 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  590.570032][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 47ffff is poisoned
> > [  604.268653][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 87ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  604.611698][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 87ffbc is poisoned
> > [  617.484205][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn c7ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  618.212344][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn c7ffff is poisoned
> > [  633.134228][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 107ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  633.874087][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 107ffff is poisoned
> > [  647.686412][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 147ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  648.425548][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 147ffff is poisoned
> > [  663.692630][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 187ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  664.432671][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 187ffff is poisoned
> > [  675.462757][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 1c7ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  676.202548][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 1c7ffff is poisoned
> > [  687.121605][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 207ff80 is poisoned
> ...
> > [  687.860981][ T2302] kpagecount_read: pfn 207ffff is poisoned
> 
> The e820 map has a hole near the end of each node and these holes are not
> initialized with init_unavailable_range() after it was interleaved with
> memmap initialization because such holes are not accounted by
> zone->spanned_pages.
> 
> Yet, I'm still cannot really understand how this never triggered 
> 
> 	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page);
> 
> before v5.7 as all the struct pages for these holes would have zone=0 and
> node=0 ... 
> 
> @Qian, can you please boot your system with memblock=debug and share the
> logs?
> 

http://people.redhat.com/qcai/memblock.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists