[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1a1a056-8347-5b5b-fcdd-8a37c24ecef9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:54:20 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: Add machine driver for
BYT/WM5102
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = snd_soc_component_set_sysclk(codec_component, ARIZONA_CLK_OPCLK, 0,
>> + rate * sr_mult, SND_SOC_CLOCK_OUT);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(codec_component->dev, "Error setting OPCLK: %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> OPCLK is a clock that can be outputted on the CODECs GPIOs. Is
> that being used to clock some external component? If so it should
> be added to the DAPM graph, if not you might as well remove this
> call.
Thanks Charles for the feedback.
I have a vague recollection that the routing was supposed to be
something like:
AP-----V
WM5102----> BT HFP
Modem--^
with processing on WM5102.
But when I look at the initial Android code there are references to the
HFP path being handled by the AP.
Probably better to remove this clock configuration if the need for it is
unclear, the goal is only to enable speaker/headset for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists