[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111214200.GA3094286@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:42:00 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
Cc: swboyd@...omium.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Convert bindings to .yaml
format
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 05:26:22PM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> Convert the bindings from .txt to .yaml format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt | 80 --------------
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.txt
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b753bdb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm SPMI PMICs multi-function device bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> + - Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
> +
> +description: |
> + The Qualcomm SPMI PMICs use a QPNP scheme through SPMI interface.
> + QPNP is effectively a partitioning scheme for dividing the SPMI extended
> + register space up into logical pieces, and set of fixed register
> + locations/definitions within these regions, with some of these regions
> + specifically used for interrupt handling.
> +
> + The QPNP PMICs are used with the Qualcomm Snapdragon series SoCs, and are
> + interfaced to the chip via the SPMI (System Power Management Interface) bus.
> + Support for multiple independent functions are implemented by splitting the
> + 16-bit SPMI slave address space into 256 smaller fixed-size regions, 256 bytes
> + each. A function can consume one or more of these fixed-size register regions.
> +
> +properties:
> + spmi_bus:
> + type: object
> + description: SPMI bus node
This is outside the scope of this binding.
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^pmic@[0-9]$":
> + description: Child PMIC nodes
> + type: object
You've defined spmi_bus and pmic@... as siblings. I assume you meant
parent/child instead. You'd need to indent all this 4 more spaces.
However, this is also outside the scope of the binding and should be
removed.
> +
> + properties:
> + compatible:
So this needs to be at the top level. 'compatible' is also how we decide
to apply a schema to a node. What you did here will never be applied.
Introduce an error to the example and see.
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + # Sorted based on subtype ID the device reports
> + - qcom,pm8941
> + - qcom,pm8841
> + - qcom,pma8084
> + - qcom,pm8019
> + - qcom,pm8226
> + - qcom,pm8110
> + - qcom,pma8084
> + - qcom,pmi8962
> + - qcom,pmd9635
> + - qcom,pm8994
> + - qcom,pmi8994
> + - qcom,pm8916
> + - qcom,pm8004
> + - qcom,pm8909
> + - qcom,pm8950
> + - qcom,pmi8950
> + - qcom,pm8998
> + - qcom,pmi8998
> + - qcom,pm8005
> + - qcom,pm660l
> + - qcom,pm660
> +
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,spmi-pmic
You can use 'const' here instead of enum.
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + Specifies the SPMI USID slave address for this device.
> + For more information see bindings/spmi/spmi.txt
> +
> + patternProperties:
> + "^[a-zA-Z0-9]$":
> + description:
> + Each child node of SPMI slave id represents a function of the PMIC.
> + In the example below the rtc device node represents a peripheral of
> + pm8941 SID = 0. The regulator device node represents a peripheral of
> + pm8941 SID = 1.
> + type: object
No, you need to define all the child nodes. This may mean you need to
split to several schemas if each PMIC has different sub devices.
> +
> + required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> +
> + spmi_bus {
> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + pmic@0 {
> + compatible = "qcom,pm8941";
> + reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
> +
> + rtc {
> + compatible = "qcom,rtc";
Not documented nor used anywhere.
> + interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 0x1>;
> + interrupt-names = "alarm";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + pmic@1 {
> + compatible = "qcom,pm8941";
> + reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>;
> +
> + regulator {
> + compatible = "qcom,regulator";
Same here.
> + regulator-name = "8941_boost";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +...
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists