lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111214221.GF17475@kunai>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:42:21 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, talho@...dia.com,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Muhammed Fazal <mfazale@...dia.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: tegra-bpmp: ignore DMA safe buffer flag

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:58:16PM +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> From: Muhammed Fazal <mfazale@...dia.com>
> 
> Ignore I2C_M_DMA_SAFE flag as it does not make a difference
> for bpmp-i2c, but causes -EINVAL to be returned for valid
> transactions.

I wonder if bailing out on an unknown flag shouldn't be revisited in
general? I mean this will happen again when a new I2C_M_* flag is
introduced.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ