[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <976641f42211af23d90464d0c4841cc40740b0d7.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:23:35 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@...eaurora.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Protect PM ops and err_handler from user
access through sysfs
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 09:27 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> >
> > If accessing sysfs nodes, which triggers a UFS UPIU request to
> > read/write UFS device descriptors during shutdown flow, there is
> > only
> > one issue that sysfs node access failure since UFS device and LINK
> > has
> > been shutdown. Strictly speaking, the failure comes after
> > ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode().
> >
> > __ufshcd_query_descriptor: opcode 0x01 for idn 0 failed, index
> > 0,
> > err = -11
>
> You misunderstood it again. You are expecting a simple query cmd
> error.
> But what really matters are NoC issues[1] and OCP[2]. And
> while/after
> UFS
> shutting down, either of them may happen.
>
> [1] When a un-clocked register access issue happens, we call it a
> NoC
> issue,
> meaning you are tring to access a register when clocks are disabled.
> This
> leads to system CRASH.
>
OK, let it simple, share this kind of crash log becuase of access sysfs
node in the shutdown flow.
> [2] OCP is over current protection. While UFS shutting down, you may
> have put UFS regulators to LPM. After that, if you are still trying
> to
> talk to UFS, OCP can happen on VCCQ/VCCQ2. This leads to system
> CRASH
> too.
the same as above, share the crash log.
>
> >
> > Since the shutdown is oneway process, this failure is not big
> > issue. If
> > you meant to avoid this failure for unsafe shutdown, I agree with
> > you,
> > But for the race issue, I don't know.
> >
>
> Easy for you to say. System crash is a big issue to any SoC vendors
> I
> belive.
>
indeed, crash is serious issue, share the log.
Thanks,
Bean
> Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists