[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d85d61319e6991dda75a68cb466c86c8fea30e4.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:25:52 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@...eaurora.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Protect PM ops and err_handler from user
access through sysfs
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 09:30 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> > > +static inline bool ufshcd_is_sysfs_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > > +{
> > > + return !hba->shutting_down;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> >
> > Can,
> >
> > Instead adding new shutting_down flag, can we use availible
> > variable
> > system_state?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bean
>
> Hi Bean,
>
> I prefer the flag shutting_down, it tells us whether
> ufshcd_shutdown()
> has been invoked or not. It comes handy when debug some system crash
> issues caused by UFS during reboot/shutdown tests. system_state is
> too
> wide in this case.
>
It is only a suggestion, and others LLD use system_state, you prefer
adding new flags.
Bean
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists