lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:40:56 +0100
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>
Cc:     ALSA development <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
        Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cros_ec_commands: Add EC_CODEC_I2S_RX_RESET

Hi,

On 12/1/21 15:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:52:31PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:42 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>>> TBH that seems like a big enough change to split out from this and done
>>> as a separate series, I'd be perfectly happy to apply your original
>>> change.  I guess part of doing that sync up should ideally be to
>>> refactor things so that it can be done mechanically in future.
> 
>> Being able to do it mechanically was the idea for introducing the script.
>> Unfortunately it doesn't help to have such a script if people don't use it.
> 
> Looking at the issues Yu-Hsuan mentions and briefly at the code I guess
> there's some updates needed with the script for namespacing around at
> least pd_ to avoid the need for hand massaging things, that'll put
> people off using the script.
> 

I even didn't know about that script :-(, or forget about it, assuming the files
are async again, I think I'm fine on only introduce that line of code instead of
a full sync (and lets think how we can do better work on this and solve in the
chrome-platform tree). I have some comments on patch 2, though.

Cheers,
  Enric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists