[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210112172919.GD4646@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:29:19 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] regulator: qcom-labibb: Implement short-circuit and
over-current IRQs
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:06:18PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> ...which was already a requirement before I touched it.
> Now, this leaves two options here:
> 1. Keep the of_get_irq way, or
> 2. Move the interrupts, change the documentation (currently, only
> pmi8998.dtsi) and also fix pmi8998.dtsi to reflect the new changes.
> I am asking before proceeding because I know that changing a schema that is
> already set sometimes gets "negated".
Well, if the binding isn't actually used changing it is a possibility.
If we keep the current binding you can still continue to use
of_get_irq() even from within the probe function, you know the name of
the node it's supposed to be in so you don't need to iterate or anything
to get it so not really any reason to use the callback.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists