[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113213230.GA488607@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:32:30 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Piotr Figiel <figiel@...gle.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, posk@...gle.com,
kyurtsever@...gle.com, ckennelly@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: Expose RSEQ configuration
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 06:41:27PM +0100, Piotr Figiel wrote:
> For userspace checkpoint and restore (C/R) some way of getting process
> state containing RSEQ configuration is needed.
> + seq_printf(m, "0x%llx 0x%x\n", (uint64_t)task->rseq, task->rseq_sig);
%llx is too much on 32-bit. "%tx %x" is better (or even %08x)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists