[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210114175718.137483-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:57:16 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tty: hvcs: Drop unnecessary if block
If hvcs_probe() succeeded dev_set_drvdata() is called with a non-NULL
value, and if hvcs_probe() failed hvcs_remove() isn't called.
So there is no way dev_get_drvdata() can return NULL in hvcs_remove() and
the check can just go away.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
index 509d1042825a..3e0461285c34 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/hvc/hvcs.c
@@ -825,9 +825,6 @@ static int hvcs_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_struct *tty;
- if (!hvcsd)
- return -ENODEV;
-
/* By this time the vty-server won't be getting any more interrupts */
spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists