[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210114175718.137483-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:57:17 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] tty: vcc: Drop unnecessary if block
If vcc_probe() succeeded dev_set_drvdata() is called with a non-NULL
value, and if vcc_probe() failed vcc_remove() isn't called.
So there is no way dev_get_drvdata() can return NULL in vcc_remove() and
the check can just go away.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/tty/vcc.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/vcc.c b/drivers/tty/vcc.c
index 9ffd42e333b8..d9b0dc6deae9 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vcc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vcc.c
@@ -681,9 +681,6 @@ static int vcc_remove(struct vio_dev *vdev)
{
struct vcc_port *port = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev);
- if (!port)
- return -ENODEV;
-
del_timer_sync(&port->rx_timer);
del_timer_sync(&port->tx_timer);
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists