linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjgvt1Ei72BTrEH5fgfqykVH-AYt56-7yBT8Lcprj7bEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:18:53 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> Given the upgrade requirement, and how clang version requirements
> constantly change, how much more difficult would it be for others
> to use gcc 7.1 or higher now instead of later?

What was the argument for jumping all the way to gcc-7.1?

I do think we want to have real reasons we can point to, rather than a
"just because".

            Linus