[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eabb211c3ba394845ec3258d86406137f4c23b33.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:30:45 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for
arm64
On Thu, 2021-01-14 at 13:18 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> >
> > Given the upgrade requirement, and how clang version requirements
> > constantly change, how much more difficult would it be for others
> > to use gcc 7.1 or higher now instead of later?
>
> What was the argument for jumping all the way to gcc-7.1?
>
> I do think we want to have real reasons we can point to, rather than a
> "just because".
KASAN v5 instead of all the old versions
gcc 7.1 supports fallthrough.
Probably more, but those might be sufficient.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists