linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210114032211.ynhesnthmsrfotfv@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:22:11 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:42:24PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Happy new year everyone, and thanks once again for the reviews.
> 
> There's still one unresolved review comment from John[3] but I don't
> think it needs to block the patchset as it stands, it can be a
> separate patch. Hope that's OK.
> 
> Differences from v5->v6 [1]:
> 
> * Carried Björn Töpel's ack for RISC-V code, plus a couple more acks from
>   Yonhgong.
> 
> * Doc fixups.
> 
> * Trivial cleanups.

Please fix riscv build and resubmit.
I think that's the only outstanding issue left.