linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ffffc36c3ffa_1eeef2081e@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 00:09:26 -0800
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/11] Atomics for eBPF

Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Happy new year everyone, and thanks once again for the reviews.
> 
> There's still one unresolved review comment from John[3] but I don't
> think it needs to block the patchset as it stands, it can be a
> separate patch. Hope that's OK.

Its ok on my side if it comes as a follow up. I think it limits the
use cases without it, but no reason to hold up the series IMO.