linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YAAszZJ2GcIYZmB5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:36:45 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/entry: emit a symbol for register restoring thunk

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:39:28AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:46:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/entry: Emit a symbol for register restoring thunk
> 
> Arnd found a randconfig that produces the warning:
> 
>   arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for insn at
>   offset 0x3e
> 
> when building with LLVM_IAS=1 (Clang's integrated assembler). Josh
> notes:
> 
>   With the LLVM assembler not generating section symbols, objtool has no
>   way to reference this code when it generates ORC unwinder entries,
>   because this code is outside of any ELF function.
> 
>   The limitation now being imposed by objtool is that all code must be
>   contained in an ELF symbol.  And .L symbols don't create such symbols.
> 
>   So basically, you can use an .L symbol *inside* a function or a code
>   segment, you just can't use the .L symbol to contain the code using a
>   SYM_*_START/END annotation pair.
> 
> Fangrui notes that this optimization is helpful for reducing image size
> when compiling with -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections. I have
> observed on the order of tens of thousands of symbols for the kernel
> images built with those flags.
> 
> A patch has been authored against GNU binutils to match this behavior
> of not generating unused section symbols ([1]), so this will
> also become a problem for users of GNU binutils once they upgrade to 2.36.
> 
> Omit the .L prefix on a label so that the assembler will emit an entry
> into the symbol table for the label, with STB_LOCAL binding. This
> enables objtool to generate proper unwind info here with LLVM_IAS=1 or
> GNU binutils 2.36+.
> 
>  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]
> 
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Suggested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

And while looking, I suppose we can delete the put_ret_addr_in_rdi crud,
but that's another patch.