[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAHFnk2r+islHd77@lx-t490>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:41:02 +0100
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/19] scsi: libsas: Remove in_interrupt() check
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:29:51PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 15/01/2021 16:27, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Shall I add you r-b tag to the whole series then, or only to the ones
> > which directly touch libsas (#3, #12, #16, and #19)?
>
> The whole series, if you like. But there was a nit about fitting some code
> on a single line still, and I think Christoph also had some issue on that
> related topic.
>
Nice. Then I'll send a v3 to fixing these 80 col issues -- including in
the intermediate patches.
> >
> > > As an aside, your analysis showed some quite poor usage of spinlocks in some
> > > drivers, specifically grabbing a lock and then calling into a depth of 3 or
> > > 4 functions.
> > >
> > Correct.
>
> BTW, testing report looked all good.
>
Oh, that's good to hear :)
Have a nice weekend,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH
Powered by blists - more mailing lists