[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210116002100.17339-1-yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:21:00 +0800
From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/MMU: Do not check unsync status for root SP.
In shadow page table, only leaf SPs may be marked as unsync.
And for non-leaf SPs, we use unsync_children to keep the number
of the unsynced children. In kvm_mmu_sync_root(), sp->unsync
shall always be zero for the root SP, hence no need to check it.
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 6d16481a..1a6bb03 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3412,8 +3412,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* mmu_need_write_protect() describe what could go wrong if this
* requirement isn't satisfied.
*/
- if (!smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync) &&
- !smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync_children))
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync_children))
return;
spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists