[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210126134531.ctj326k3xwvmniwd@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:45:31 +0800
From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/MMU: Do not check unsync status for root SP.
Hi Paolo,
Any comments? Thanks!
B.R.
Yu
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 08:21:00AM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> In shadow page table, only leaf SPs may be marked as unsync.
> And for non-leaf SPs, we use unsync_children to keep the number
> of the unsynced children. In kvm_mmu_sync_root(), sp->unsync
> shall always be zero for the root SP, hence no need to check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 6d16481a..1a6bb03 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3412,8 +3412,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * mmu_need_write_protect() describe what could go wrong if this
> * requirement isn't satisfied.
> */
> - if (!smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync) &&
> - !smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync_children))
> + if (!smp_load_acquire(&sp->unsync_children))
> return;
>
> spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists