[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dfd9776-4b8f-45f8-b673-ecb7fa6e16be@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:03:49 +0000
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kasan, arm64: fix pointer tags in KASAN reports
On 1/15/21 5:41 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> As of the "arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo" patch, the address
> that is passed to report_tag_fault has pointer tags in the format of 0x0X,
> while KASAN uses 0xFX format (note the difference in the top 4 bits).
>
> Fix up the pointer tag for kernel pointers in do_tag_check_fault by
> setting them to the same value as bit 55. Explicitly use __untagged_addr()
> instead of untagged_addr(), as the latter doesn't affect TTBR1 addresses.
>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I9ced973866036d8679e8f4ae325de547eb969649
> Fixes: dceec3ff7807 ("arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo")
> Fixes: 4291e9ee6189 ("kasan, arm64: print report from tag fault handler")
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 3c40da479899..35d75c60e2b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -709,10 +709,11 @@ static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned int esr,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> /*
> - * The architecture specifies that bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are UNKNOWN for tag
> - * check faults. Mask them out now so that userspace doesn't see them.
> + * The architecture specifies that bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are UNKNOWN
> + * for tag check faults. Set them to corresponding bits in the untagged
> + * address.
> */
> - far &= (1UL << 60) - 1;
> + far = (__untagged_addr(far) & ~MTE_TAG_MASK) | (far & MTE_TAG_MASK);
> do_bad_area(far, esr, regs);
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Vincenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists