linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kasan, arm64: fix pointer tags in KASAN reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:08:59 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
        Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kasan, arm64: fix pointer tags in KASAN reports

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:59 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:41:53PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > As of the "arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo" patch, the address
> > that is passed to report_tag_fault has pointer tags in the format of 0x0X,
> > while KASAN uses 0xFX format (note the difference in the top 4 bits).
> >
> > Fix up the pointer tag for kernel pointers in do_tag_check_fault by
> > setting them to the same value as bit 55. Explicitly use __untagged_addr()
> > instead of untagged_addr(), as the latter doesn't affect TTBR1 addresses.
> >
> > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I9ced973866036d8679e8f4ae325de547eb969649
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>
> Unless there are other comments, I'll queue this for -rc5 through the
> arm64 tree (I already finalised the arm64 for-next/fixes branch for this
> week).

Sounds good, thank you!