linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v4 2/2] cgroup: svm: Encryption IDs cgroup documentation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YAICaoSyk2O2nU+P@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:00:26 -0500
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Cc:     thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, jon.grimm@....com,
        eric.vantassell@....com, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, corbet@....net, joro@...tes.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        gingell@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, dionnaglaze@...gle.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/2] cgroup: svm: Encryption IDs cgroup documentation.

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:28:46PM -0800, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> Documentation for both cgroup versions, v1 and v2, of Encryption IDs
> controller. This new controller is used to track and limit usage of
> hardware memory encryption capabilities on the CPUs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/encryption_ids.rst  | 108 ++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst       |  78 ++++++++++++-

Given how trivial it is, I'm not gonna object to adding new v1 interface but
maybe just point to v2 doc from v1?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun