lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAIMJ9E8NneoAp8H@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:41:59 -0800
From:   Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, jon.grimm@....com,
        eric.vantassell@....com, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, corbet@....net, joro@...tes.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        gingell@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, dionnaglaze@...gle.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 2/2] cgroup: svm: Encryption IDs cgroup documentation.

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:00:26PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:28:46PM -0800, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > Documentation for both cgroup versions, v1 and v2, of Encryption IDs
> > controller. This new controller is used to track and limit usage of
> > hardware memory encryption capabilities on the CPUs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  .../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/encryption_ids.rst  | 108 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst       |  78 ++++++++++++-
> 
> Given how trivial it is, I'm not gonna object to adding new v1 interface but
> maybe just point to v2 doc from v1?
> 

Sure, I will just add the path to v2 doc in v1.

> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ