lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:37:44 +0900
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Resolve symbols against debug file first

Hello,

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:17 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:43 PM Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13. 01. 21, 11:46, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:01:28AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> >> With LTO, there are symbols like these:
> >> >> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8-4.8-1.4.x86_64.debug
> >> >>   10305: 0000000000955fa4     0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT   29 Predicate.cpp.2bc410e7
> >> >>
> >> >> This comes from a runtime/debug split done by the standard way:
> >> >> objcopy --only-keep-debug $runtime $debug
> >> >> objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=$debugfn -R .comment -R .GCC.command.line --strip-all $runtime
> >> >>
> ...
> >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >> >> index f3577f7d72fe..a31b716fa61c 100644
> >> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> >> >> @@ -1226,12 +1226,20 @@ int dso__load_sym(struct dso *dso, struct map *map, struct symsrc *syms_ss,
> >> >>              if (sym.st_shndx == SHN_ABS)
> >> >>                      continue;
> >> >>
> >> >> -            sec = elf_getscn(runtime_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
> >> >> +            sec = elf_getscn(syms_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
> >> >>              if (!sec)
> >> >>                      goto out_elf_end;
> >> >
> >> > we iterate symbols from syms_ss, so the fix seems to be correct
> >> > to call elf_getscn on syms_ss, not on runtime_ss as we do now
> >> >
> >> > I'd think this worked only when runtime_ss == syms_ss
> >>
> >> No, because the headers are copied 1:1 from runtime_ss to syms_ss. And
> >> runtime_ss is then stripped, so only .debug* sections are removed there.
> >> (And syms_ss's are set as NOBITS.)
> >>
> >> We iterated .debug* sections in syms_ss and used runtime_ss section
> >> _headers_ only to adjust symbols (sometimes). That worked.
> >
> > It seems PPC has an opd section only in the runtime_ss and that's why
> > we use it for section headers.
>
> At least on my system (Ubuntu 20.04.1) I see .opd in the debug file with
> NOBITS set:
>
> $ readelf -e vmlinux.debug | grep opd
>   [37] .opd              NOBITS           c000000001c1f548  01202e14
>
>
> But possibly that's not the case with older toolchains?

I was referring to this commit:

commit 261360b6e90a782f0a63d8f61a67683c376c88cf
Author: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 10 15:23:01 2012 -0700

    perf symbols: Convert dso__load_syms to take 2 symsrc's

    To properly handle platforms with an opd section, both a runtime image
    (which contains the opd section but possibly lacks symbols) and a symbol
    image (which probably lacks an opd section but has symbols).

    The next patch ("perf symbol: use both runtime and debug images")
    adjusts the callsite in dso__load() to take advantage of being able to
    pass both runtime & debug images.

    Assumptions made here:

     - The opd section, if it exists in the runtime image, has headers in
       both the runtime image and the debug/syms image.

     - The index of the opd section (again, only if it exists in the runtime
       image) is the same in both the runtime and debug/symbols image.

    Both of these are true on RHEL, but it is unclear how accurate they are
    in general (on platforms with function descriptors in opd sections).

    Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>


Thanks,
Namhyung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists