[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6001540-c028-8728-413b-273a11d00ffe@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:43:07 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Resolve symbols against debug file first
On 13. 01. 21, 11:46, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:01:28AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> With LTO, there are symbols like these:
>> /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8-4.8-1.4.x86_64.debug
>> 10305: 0000000000955fa4 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT 29 Predicate.cpp.2bc410e7
>>
>> This comes from a runtime/debug split done by the standard way:
>> objcopy --only-keep-debug $runtime $debug
>> objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink=$debugfn -R .comment -R .GCC.command.line --strip-all $runtime
>>
>> perf currently cannot resolve such symbols (relicts of LTO), as section
>> 29 exists only in the debug file (29 is .debug_info). And perf resolves
>> symbols only against runtime file. This results in all symbols from such
>> a library being unresolved:
>> 0.38% main2 libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8 [.] 0x00000000000671e0
>>
>> So try resolving against the debug file first. And only if it fails (the
>> section has NOBITS set), try runtime file. We can do this, as "objcopy
>> --only-keep-debug" per documentation preserves all sections, but clears
>> data of some of them (the runtime ones) and marks them as NOBITS.
>>
>> The correct result is now:
>> 0.38% main2 libantlr4-runtime.so.4.8 [.] antlr4::IntStream::~IntStream
>>
>> Note that these LTO symbols are properly skipped anyway as they belong
>> neither to *text* nor to *data* (is_label && !elf_sec__filter(&shdr,
>> secstrs) is true).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
>> index f3577f7d72fe..a31b716fa61c 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
>> @@ -1226,12 +1226,20 @@ int dso__load_sym(struct dso *dso, struct map *map, struct symsrc *syms_ss,
>> if (sym.st_shndx == SHN_ABS)
>> continue;
>>
>> - sec = elf_getscn(runtime_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
>> + sec = elf_getscn(syms_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
>> if (!sec)
>> goto out_elf_end;
>
> we iterate symbols from syms_ss, so the fix seems to be correct
> to call elf_getscn on syms_ss, not on runtime_ss as we do now
>
> I'd think this worked only when runtime_ss == syms_ss
>
>>
>> gelf_getshdr(sec, &shdr);
>>
>> + if (shdr.sh_type == SHT_NOBITS) {
>> + sec = elf_getscn(runtime_ss->elf, sym.st_shndx);
>> + if (!sec)
>> + goto out_elf_end;
>> +
>> + gelf_getshdr(sec, &shdr);
>> + }
>
> is that fallback necessary? the symbol is from syms_ss
To resume this and answer:
Yes, the fallback is necessary.
It's because syms_ss section header has NOBITS set for the sections, so
file offset is not incremented. So shdr.sh_offset (the file offset) used
further in dso__load_sym has different values for syms and runtime. The
syms_ss (the NOBITS) one is invalid as it has 0x1000 here. The runtime
one contains good values (like 000509d0 here):
.text 00082560 00000000000509d0 00000000000509d0 [-00001000-]
{+000509d0+} 2**4
That is, without the fallback, the computed symbol address is wrong.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists