[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210115075935epcms2p6e7fb72edab9f5f1390164b3c66c016d5@epcms2p6>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:59:35 +0900
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"huobean@...il.com" <huobean@...il.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v18 3/3] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached
sub-region
Hi Can Guo,
>
> On 2021-01-13 09:36, Daejun Park wrote:
> > Hi Can Guo,
> >
> >> > +static void
> >> > +ufshpb_set_hpb_read_to_upiu(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb, struct ufshcd_lrb
> >> > *lrbp,
> >> > + u32 lpn, u64 ppn, unsigned int transfer_len)
> >> > +{
> >> > + unsigned char *cdb = lrbp->ucd_req_ptr->sc.cdb;
> >> > +
> >> > + cdb[0] = UFSHPB_READ;
> >>
> >> You are only replacing opcode in cdb[0], but
> >> ufshcd_add_command_trace()
> >> is
> >> counting on lrbp->cmd->cmnd. This will lead to wrong opcode recorded
> >> by
> >> UFS ftrace.
> >>
> > You're comment is good point for improving this patch. But there is no
> > "case" for HPB read (0xF8) in ufshcd_add_command_trace().
> > So I will add codes to support tracing HPB read command in
> > ufshcd_add_command_trace() on next patch.
> >
>
> It is not just about ftrace. If HPB READ cmd fails with sense key infos.
> When SCSI layer prints the cmd, it still prints the READ(10) CDB, which
> is
> misleading.
Oh, thanks. I will fix this problem on next patch.
Daejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists