[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAan6haGjnIlNIoJ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:35:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
Cc: daniel@...ll.ch, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/syncobj: make lockdep complain on WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT v2
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 07:03:34PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> index 6e74e6745eca..f51458615158 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,13 @@ int drm_syncobj_find_fence(struct drm_file *file_private,
> if (!syncobj)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + /* Waiting for userspace with locks help is illegal cause that can
> + * trivial deadlock with page faults for example. Make lockdep complain
> + * about it early on.
> + */
Egads, the cursed comment style is spreading :/
> + if (flags & DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT)
> + lockdep_assert_none_held_once();
> +
Should this not be part of drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait() instead? Also,
do you want to sprinkle might_sleep() around ?
> *fence = drm_syncobj_fence_get(syncobj);
> drm_syncobj_put(syncobj);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists