[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119093542.GP4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:35:42 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
andy@...nel.org, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
wsa@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, robert.moore@...el.com,
erik.kaneda@...el.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] platform: x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 08:21:23AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:11:40AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> > On 18/01/2021 21:19, Daniel Scally wrote:
...
> > (also, Laurent, if we did it this way we wouldn't be able to also handle
> > the led-indicator GPIO here without some fairly major rework)
>
> Given the additional complexity I don't think it's worth it, your
> implementation is fine and code duplication with clk-gpio is minimal.
Making clk-gpio.c available as a library is a win in long term and reduces a
possible duplication by others in the future. I bet we even might find already
clk-gpio parts in some drivers.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists