[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119110131.GA18433@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:01:31 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, gustavoars@...nel.org,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/cpuinfo: Show right CPU architecture information
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 06:55:10PM +0800, Liguang Zhang wrote:
> CPU architecture is assigned to be a fixed value, it should be obtained
> from midr register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> index 77605aec25fe..0bd11e0fe9f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>
> seq_printf(m, "CPU implementer\t: 0x%02x\n",
> MIDR_IMPLEMENTOR(midr));
> - seq_printf(m, "CPU architecture: 8\n");
> + seq_printf(m, "CPU architecture: %d\n", MIDR_ARCHITECTURE(midr));
Huh? Won't this always return 0xf?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists