[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAhsLPLXg37fs/BA@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:45:16 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: vincent.donnefort@....com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpu/hotplug: Add cpuhp_invoke_callback_range()
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:10:46PM +0000, vincent.donnefort@....com wrote:
> @@ -475,6 +478,11 @@ cpuhp_set_state(struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st, enum cpuhp_state target)
> static inline void
> cpuhp_reset_state(struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st, enum cpuhp_state prev_state)
> {
> + st->target = prev_state;
> +
> + if (st->rollback)
> + return;
I'm thinking that if we call rollback while already rollback we're hosed
something fierce, no?
That like going up, failing, going back down again, also failing, giving
up in a fiery death.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists