[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx8DP8J53ntxX2VCSnbMfq1qki7gD-md+NC_jVfOkTam3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:01:18 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Jon <jon@...id-run.com>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 09/15] device property: Introduce fwnode_get_id()
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:15 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:51 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 7:02 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:30:31AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:42 AM Calvin Johnson
> > > > > <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", id);
> > > > > > + if (!(ret && is_acpi_node(fwnode)))
> > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > > > > + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(fwnode),
> > > > > > + METHOD_NAME__ADR, NULL, &adr);
> > > > > > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > + *id = (u32)adr;
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > + return 0;
> >
> > > > > Also ACPI and DT
> > > > > aren't mutually exclusive if I'm not mistaken.
> > > >
> > > > That's why we try 'reg' property for both cases first.
> > > >
> > > > is_acpi_fwnode() conditional is that what I don't like though.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean here, care to elaborate?
> >
> > I meant is_acpi_node(fwnode) in the conditional.
> >
> > I think it's redundant and we can simple do something like this:
> >
> > if (ret) {
> > #ifdef ACPI
> > ...
> > #else
> > return ret;
> > #endif
> > }
> > return 0;
> >
> > --
>
> Right, that should work. And I'd prefer it too.
Rafael,
I'd rather this new function be an ops instead of a bunch of #ifdef or
if (acpi) checks. Thoughts?
-Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists