[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d064a9b-bbb6-4ef9-b959-d64c14850319@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:07:57 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
"kjain@...ux.ibm.com" <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf metricgroup: Fix system PMU metrics
On 20/01/2021 12:56, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> that's fixing the issue for me, this was crashing:
> # perf stat -a -I 1000 -M L1D_Cache_Fill_BW,L2_Cache_Fill_BW
>
> could you please send it formaly, so it can be merged?
>
I will do it today. But I want to make sure that the logic is correct,
so checking it all again, i.e. I can fix the segfault but the logic may
be wrong.
I think Ian wrote this code originally or made the most recent rework
(which I tried to fix), so would like him to check also.
> I can't reproduce the original patch issue and I need
> to check the code in more depth
It should only occur for metrics when using system PMUs, i.e. match via
identifier file, so I really doubt your system has them.
I'd like to add a test for this - I need to think how...
Cheers,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists