linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 28/45] net: stmmac: Fixed mtu channged by cache aligned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210120142659.GC4035784@sasha-vm>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:26:59 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 28/45] net: stmmac: Fixed mtu channged by
 cache aligned

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:08:15PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:25:45 -0500 Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 5b55299eed78538cc4746e50ee97103a1643249c ]
>>
>> Since the original mtu is not used when the mtu is updated,
>> the mtu is aligned with cache, this will get an incorrect.
>> For example, if you want to configure the mtu to be 1500,
>> but mtu 1536 is configured in fact.
>>
>> Fixed: eaf4fac478077 ("net: stmmac: Do not accept invalid MTU values")
>> Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210113034109.27865-1-david.wu@rock-chips.com
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>
>This was applied 6 days ago, I thought you said you wait two weeks.
>What am I missing?

The "AUTOSEL" review cycle is an additional hurdle automatically
selected patches need to clear before being queued up. There are 7 days
between the day I sent the review for these and the first day I might
queue them up.

This mail isn't an indication that the patch has been added to the
queue, it's just an extra step to give folks time to object.

If you add up all the days you'll get >14 :)

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha