[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6b5b7f3-ba38-be61-d3fe-975c3343a79d@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:32:50 -0600
From: john.p.donnelly@...cle.com
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@...onical.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>,
Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@...cle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
kexec mailing list <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"# v4 . 16+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@...meeyes.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/crash_core.c - Add crashkernel=auto for x86
and ARM
On 11/22/20 9:47 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
> On 11/22/20 at 12:32pm, Guilherme Piccoli wrote:
>> Hi Dave and Kairui, thanks for your responses! OK, if that makes sense
>> to you I'm fine with it. I'd just recommend to test recent kernels in
>> multiple distros with the minimum "range" to see if 64M is enough for
>> crashkernel, maybe we'd need to bump that.
>
> Giving the different kernel configs and the different userspace
> initramfs setup it is hard to get an uniform value for all distributions,
> but we can have an interface/kconfig-option for them to provide a value like this patch
> is doing. And it could be improved like Kairui said about some known
> kernel added extra values later, probably some more improvements if
> doable.
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
Hi.
Are we going to move forward with implementing this for X86 and Arm ?
If other platform maintainers want to include this CONFIG option in
their configuration settings they have a starting point.
Thank you,
John.
( I am not currently on many of the included dist lists in this email,
so hopefully key contributors are included in this exchange )
Powered by blists - more mailing lists