linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: fix use-after-free in sunxi_pmx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:40:13 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@...ngsmart.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...l.net,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        liuxiang_1999@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: fix use-after-free in sunxi_pmx_free()

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:29:08PM +0800, Liu Xiang wrote:
> When CONFIG_REGULATOR is not set, sunxi_pmx_request() always return
> success. Even a group of pins call sunxi_pmx_request(), the refcount
> is only 1. This can cause a use-after-free warning in sunxi_pmx_free().
> To solve this problem, go to err path if regulator_get() return NULL
> or error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@...ngsmart.com>

Is there any drawback to depending on CONFIG_REGULATOR?

Given that we need those regulators enabled anyway, I guess we could
just select or depends on it

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)