[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAr9xaQM3LTU8vfS@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:31:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wesley Zhao <zhaowei1102@...ndersoft.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, kerneldev@...smulder.nl, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
joe@...ches.com, gpiccoli@...onical.com, aquini@...hat.com,
gustavoars@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...ogle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, guohanjun@...wei.com,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] resource: Make it possible to reserve memory on
64bit platform
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:55:37AM -0800, Wesley Zhao wrote:
> For now "reserve=" is limitied to 32bit,not available on 64bit
> platform,so we change the get_option() to get_option_ull(added in
> patch: commit 4b6bfe96265e ("lib/cmdline: add new function
> get_option_ull()"))
Do better grammar and punctuation.
"For now "reserve=" is limited to 32bit, and not available on 64bit platform,
so we change the get_option() to get_option_ull() which is added in the
previous patch."
But!
You don't need to alter cmdline.c at all, see memparse() for the details!
And you have been told already, look at other options. You failed to mentioned
in the cover letter what's wrong with recommended memmap= approach.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists