[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210123100608.2349629-2-yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 05:06:08 -0500
From: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
To: <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <hushiyuan@...wei.com>, <hewenliang4@...wei.com>,
<caihongda@...wei.com>, <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] powercap/intel_rapl: Use topology interface in rapl_init_domains()
It's not a good way to access the phys_proc_id of cpuinfo directly.
So using topology_physical_package_id(cpu) instead.
Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@...wei.com>
---
drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
index 5f3d39b8212a..8888adcb3927 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_common.c
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static void rapl_init_domains(struct rapl_package *rp)
if (i == RAPL_DOMAIN_PLATFORM && rp->id > 0) {
snprintf(rd->name, RAPL_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH, "psys-%d",
- cpu_data(rp->lead_cpu).phys_proc_id);
+ topology_physical_package_id(rp->lead_cpu));
} else
snprintf(rd->name, RAPL_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH, "%s",
rapl_domain_names[i]);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists