[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0e32ad0-487f-9d57-7287-835eee836514@oracle.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:34:38 -0800
From: "santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>, ohad@...ery.com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
ssantosh@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, praneeth@...com,
rogerq@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
Hi Suman, Mathieu,
On 1/7/21 2:49 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> On 1/7/21 4:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:03:25PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>
[...]
>> I only see input from Andy and Lars in the thread you point out, nothing from
>> Greg. I have also taken a look at the patch [1] that made checkpatch complain
>> about ENOTSUPP. From what I see in that commit log the goal is to prevent new
>> additions of ENOTSUPP to the kernel.
>>
>> Please modify and resend, otherwise I'm sure someone will send another patch to
>> fix it before the end of the cycle.
>
> Yeah ok. I will send out a v3.
>
I haven't seen v3 of this series yet. Please post it
if you would like to include it for 5.12.
Regards,
Santosh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists