[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5252e8d-094a-dcb7-7ccb-172e58ab3413@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:43:18 -0600
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: "santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>,
<ohad@...ery.com>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <praneeth@...com>,
<rogerq@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce PRU remoteproc consumer API
Hi Santosh,
On 1/24/21 10:34 PM, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com wrote:
> Hi Suman, Mathieu,
>
> On 1/7/21 2:49 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>> On 1/7/21 4:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:03:25PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>>
> [...]
>>> I only see input from Andy and Lars in the thread you point out, nothing from
>>> Greg. I have also taken a look at the patch [1] that made checkpatch complain
>>> about ENOTSUPP. From what I see in that commit log the goal is to prevent new
>>> additions of ENOTSUPP to the kernel.
>>>
>>> Please modify and resend, otherwise I'm sure someone will send another patch to
>>> fix it before the end of the cycle.
>>
>> Yeah ok. I will send out a v3.
>>
> I haven't seen v3 of this series yet. Please post it
> if you would like to include it for 5.12.
This series is dependent on couple of patches that would have to come through
the remoteproc tree first, and I need to post the next versions of those as
well. So, let me sort out those first. You can drop this from your queue for 5.12.
regards
Suman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists