[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210125162542.GA5795@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:25:42 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Cc: Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@...zon.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH dwc-next v2 0/2] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:16:11PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Some designware based device driver especially host only driver may
> work well with the default read_dbi/write_dbi/link_up implementation
> in pcie-designware.c, thus remove the assumption to simplify those
> drivers.
>
> Since v1:
> - rebase to the latest dwc-next
>
> Jisheng Zhang (2):
> PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists
> PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-al.c | 4 ----
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 8 +++-----
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Would you mind rebasing it against my current pci/dwc branch please ?
I shall apply it then.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists