linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b975e215-0dd1-65fe-be51-c7c8c7b6571a@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:06:19 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

On 1/24/21 7:56 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> On 19:48 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
>>>
>>> In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today, as people
>>> unloaded their work for the week on me. The end result is a slightly
>>> larger than usual rc5 (but both 5.10 and 5.8 were bigger, so not some
>>> kind of odd outlier).
>>>
>>> Nothing particularly stands out. We had a couple of splice()
>>> regressions that came in during the previous release as part of the
>>> "get rid of set_fs()" development, but they were for odd cases that
>>> most people would never notice. I think it's just that 5.10 is now
>>> getting more widely deployed so people see the fallout from that
>>> rather fundamental change in the last release.  And the only reason I
>>> even reacted to those is just because I ended up being involved with
>>> some of the tty patches during the early calm period of the past week.
>>> There's a few more still pending.
>>>
>>> But the bulk of it all is all the usual miscellaneous fixes all over
>>> the place, and a lot of it is truly trivial one- or few-liners. Just
>>> under half the patch is for drivers, with the rest being the usual mix
>>> of tooling, arch updates, filesystem and core (mm, scheduling,
>>> networking).
>>>
>>> Nothing here makes me go "Uhhuh" in other words.
>>>
>>
>> Looking pretty good now.
>>
>> Build results:
>>     total: 153 pass: 153 fail: 0
>> Qemu test results:
>>     total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0
>>
>> Guenter
> 
> Hey,
> 
> Mind letting us know ,what you are running? Any automated stuff? Any specific
> tool or tools?? Scripts???
> 
> Bloody curious to know Guenter ...if those stuff are expose able to public
> consumption , please do provide the pointer too (I am being lazy to find it)
> 

Results:
	https://kerneltests.org/builders
Script repository:
	https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test

Guenter



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)