linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Jan 2021 09:41:15 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.11-rc5

On 20:06 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>On 1/24/21 7:56 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> On 19:48 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>> So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
>>>>
>>>> In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today, as people
>>>> unloaded their work for the week on me. The end result is a slightly
>>>> larger than usual rc5 (but both 5.10 and 5.8 were bigger, so not some
>>>> kind of odd outlier).
>>>>
>>>> Nothing particularly stands out. We had a couple of splice()
>>>> regressions that came in during the previous release as part of the
>>>> "get rid of set_fs()" development, but they were for odd cases that
>>>> most people would never notice. I think it's just that 5.10 is now
>>>> getting more widely deployed so people see the fallout from that
>>>> rather fundamental change in the last release.  And the only reason I
>>>> even reacted to those is just because I ended up being involved with
>>>> some of the tty patches during the early calm period of the past week.
>>>> There's a few more still pending.
>>>>
>>>> But the bulk of it all is all the usual miscellaneous fixes all over
>>>> the place, and a lot of it is truly trivial one- or few-liners. Just
>>>> under half the patch is for drivers, with the rest being the usual mix
>>>> of tooling, arch updates, filesystem and core (mm, scheduling,
>>>> networking).
>>>>
>>>> Nothing here makes me go "Uhhuh" in other words.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looking pretty good now.
>>>
>>> Build results:
>>>     total: 153 pass: 153 fail: 0
>>> Qemu test results:
>>>     total: 430 pass: 430 fail: 0
>>>
>>> Guenter
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Mind letting us know ,what you are running? Any automated stuff? Any specific
>> tool or tools?? Scripts???
>>
>> Bloody curious to know Guenter ...if those stuff are expose able to public
>> consumption , please do provide the pointer too (I am being lazy to find it)
>>
>
>Results:
>	https://kerneltests.org/builders
>Script repository:
>	https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test
>
>Guenter
>

Thanks a bunch!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)