[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff9b0625-2892-3df9-a31e-c23a8c94e10b@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 06:56:28 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, jamie@...ieiles.com,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-binding: watchdog: add more Rockchip compatibles
to snps,dw-wdt.yaml
On 1/26/21 12:37 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2021, 05:55:59 CET schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> On 1/25/21 3:40 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 23. Januar 2021, 18:34:01 CET schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 01:05:27PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
>>>>> The watchdog compatible strings are suppose to be SoC orientated.
>>>>> In the more recently added Rockchip SoC dtsi files only
>>>>> the fallback string "snps,dw-wdt" is used, so add the following
>>>>> compatible strings:
>>>>>
>>>>> "rockchip,px30-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3228-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3308-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3328-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rk3399-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>> "rockchip,rv1108-wdt", "snps,dw-wdt"
>>>>>
>>>>> make ARCH=arm dtbs_check
>>>>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
>>>>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>>
>>> just to clarify, do you expect me to pick up the dt-binding patch
>>> with the devicetree patches or do you want to take this individual
>>> patch through the watchdog tree instead?
>>>
>>
>> You'd have to ask Wim since he takes care of actually sending pull requests.
>> But didn't you say earlier that you wanted to apply the rest of the series
>> after this one is applied through the watchdog tree ?
>
> Yep that was my intent, though somehow I mistook you as also being
> a watchdog maintainer, hence the confusion.
>
I am, but Wim sends all pull requests.
Guenter
> So I'll wait for Wim to apply this patch and then I'll take the rest of
> the series.
>
> Thanks
> Heiko
>
>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>> index f7ee9229c..b58596b18 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml
>>>>> @@ -18,10 +18,16 @@ properties:
>>>>> - const: snps,dw-wdt
>>>>> - items:
>>>>> - enum:
>>>>> + - rockchip,px30-wdt
>>>>> - rockchip,rk3066-wdt
>>>>> - rockchip,rk3188-wdt
>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3228-wdt
>>>>> - rockchip,rk3288-wdt
>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3308-wdt
>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3328-wdt
>>>>> - rockchip,rk3368-wdt
>>>>> + - rockchip,rk3399-wdt
>>>>> + - rockchip,rv1108-wdt
>>>>> - const: snps,dw-wdt
>>>>>
>>>>> reg:
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists