[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59c31515-8275-5dfe-0276-ed9353bceb6c@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:46:02 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
CC: "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf vendor events: Add Fujitsu A64FX V1.2 pmu
event
On 22/01/2021 08:37, nakamura.shun@...itsu.com wrote:
>> I think that we need to the same here as the IMPDEF recommended events - add a
>> common JSON to reduce the duplication.
>>
>> I had done work on this for current CPUs, but never got it finished. Let me check
>> the status.
> If you let me know the result, I will resend the patch according to the policy.
I just sent this:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1611575600-2440-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com/T/#u
And now I have noticed that I did not cc arm64 reviewers :(
Anyway, it should be ok to base on that series.
And please add guys under "PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" for sending
patches for perf, and not just the arm64 guys.
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists