[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB4600437C6564700CCA65654CF7BC0@OSBPR01MB4600.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:03:29 +0000
From: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
To: 'John Garry' <john.garry@...wei.com>
CC: "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf vendor events: Add Fujitsu A64FX V1.2 pmu
event
Hi, John
Thanks for the info.
Best Regards
Shunsuke
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 9:46 PM
> To: Nakamura, Shunsuke/中村 俊介 <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
> Cc: will@...nel.org; mathieu.poirier@...aro.org; leo.yan@...aro.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf vendor events: Add Fujitsu A64FX V1.2 pmu
> event
>
> On 22/01/2021 08:37, nakamura.shun@...itsu.com wrote:
> >> I think that we need to the same here as the IMPDEF recommended
> >> events - add a common JSON to reduce the duplication.
> >>
> >> I had done work on this for current CPUs, but never got it finished.
> >> Let me check the status.
> > If you let me know the result, I will resend the patch according to the policy.
>
> I just sent this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1611575600-2440-1-git-send-email-john.garry@hu
> awei.com/T/#u
>
> And now I have noticed that I did not cc arm64 reviewers :(
>
> Anyway, it should be ok to base on that series.
>
> And please add guys under "PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" for sending
> patches for perf, and not just the arm64 guys.
>
> Thanks,
> John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists