[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1611574452.y64320stks.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 21:37:08 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/12] powerpc: inline huge vmap supported functions
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of January 25, 2021 6:42 pm:
>
>
> Le 24/01/2021 à 09:22, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> This allows unsupported levels to be constant folded away, and so
>> p4d_free_pud_page can be removed because it's no longer linked to.
>
> Ah, ok, you did it here. Why not squashing this patch into patch 5 directly ?
To reduce arch code movement in the first patch and split up these arch
patches to get separate acks for them.
Maybe overkill for these changes but doesn't hurt I think.
Thanks,
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists